I am musing today about the participation of children and young people. This typology is based on Reddy & Ratna's Scenarios of Adult-Children Engagement. (Reddy, N. & K. Ratna (eds.) (2002) A Journey in Children’s Participation, The Concerned for Working Children, Bangalore, India. www.workingchild.org)
When in practice you thinking about overlaying the top levels of participation 8-13 (keep reading) one can begin to understand the potency of these ideas on child health - say on whether or how we get children involved in preventing malaria or HIV or here in the UK - obesity or teen pregnancy. Give it a go and tell me what you think.
Scenarios of Adult-Children Engagement
1 Active resistance
Adults actively resist the participation of young people. Some of them feel that young people should not be burdened with participation. Some believe that young people do not have the capacity to participate and hence cannot make informed choices. Some hold the view that young people are easy to manipulate and hence their participation may be used only to further adult agendas. Adults in this category can take strong positions against children’s participation, mobilise support, and lobby against it.
2 Hindrance
Adults hinder children’s participation. They may block opportunities for young people and discourage participation. There are others in this category that may voice their support to children’s participation, but the manner in which they interact with young people may actually hinder it. They may undermine the ability of young people or make them feel inadequate and reluctant to participate.
3 Manipulation
Adults manipulate young people to further their own agendas. They may coach young people to voice what they want or cleverly interpret what young peoples say/do to suit their own interests. Sometimes this manipulation is obvious, sometimes subtle. There are other adults who manipulate young people in order to ‘get the best performance’ out of them supposedly done in the best interest of the child. Facilitators need to be vigilant against manipulating young people.
4 Decoration
Adults treat young people more or less like decorative objects, where they are expected to add colour to the proceedings. For example, when young people are called to present bouquets or sing songs –and not much is made of their presence.
5 Tokenism
Adults involve young people to get status from their presence. They use the presence of young people to be counted as ‘advocates of children’s rights’ and to be politically correct.
6 Tolerance
Adults bear with the notion of participation to fulfil someone else’s agenda. Adults may undertake consultative exercises with young people without truly valuing or crediting the process or the outcome.
7 Indulgence
Adults find children’s participation ‘cute’ and ‘interesting’ and are willing to provide limited spaces for young people to voice their opinions. They prompt young people to speak up and try to keep the environment friendly. They listen to the opinions expressed by children with interest, but do follow through with seriousness. These are mostly one time events and little of consequence happens from such ‘participation’.
8 Children assigned but informed:
Adults work with children with seriousness. They decide on what needs to be done, and keep young people informed. They encourage them to be active and guide children to implement the task. They do not expect young people’s input into the larger design of the process.
9 Children consulted and informed
Adults believe in consulting young people and keeping them involved. The adults take the lead, inform the young people about the situation, and seek their opinion. They try to give young people a sense of ownership over some aspects of the process and under their supervision. The adults are in control over the process and they keep it flexible to incorporate the suggestions and concerns of the young people.
10 Adult initiated, shared decisions with children
Adults initiate a project and are willing to share the decision making with young people. It is a collaborative interaction where they make a joint effort. Here too children and adults may take on different roles, yet those roles are defined by mutual consent.
11 Children – initiated, shared decisions with adults
Young people and their organisations take the initiative and invite adults to collaborate. Young people and adults are involved in joint decision-making. They share ownership of the process and outcomes. Within the collaboration, young people and adults take on different roles defined by mutual consent.
12 Children initiated and directed
Young people and their organisations are in control and they may or may not involve adults. Even then, they work out the way adults are to participate. Young people continue to keep the process under their control and have ownership.
13 Jointly initiated and directed by children and adults
Adults and children develop a partnership which they jointly initiate and direct. This includes partnership over the idea, the process and the outcome. They may play different roles, based on mutual consent. This relationship is possible only when the adults and children are empowered and are able to pool their respective strengths to achieve a common objective.